In Brief
In this criminal appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether an unconnected third party—described as a social activist and advocate—could file an application before the High Court seeking directions to expedite a criminal trial involving corruption charges. The Court held that such a person lacks locus standi (legal standing) to file such an application, as they are not connected with the proceedings. The Court noted that while expediting corruption trials is generally desirable, only parties with legitimate interest—such as the prosecution or accused's employer—can seek such directions. The High Court's order entertained from an unconnected party was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.