Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-03-09 allowed

Sanjeev & Anr vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

A police party recovered charas (cannabis resin) from appellants near Ruara Bridge in Himachal Pradesh and registered an FIR under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The Trial Court acquitted the appellants, finding that the FSL report did not confirm the substance was cannabis-derived charas, and the police failed to offer the option to be searched before a Magistrate. The High Court reversed this acquittal and imposed ten years' rigorous imprisonment. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that when addressing an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court must first examine whether the Trial Court's reasons for acquittal are sustainable before independent reappraisal. The Court found the Trial Court's assessment correct and restored the acquittal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Appellate Procedure Appeal Against Acquittal Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Trial Court Discretion Procedural Safeguards Evidence Burden of Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login