Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-01 disposed

Sant Prasad vs Kausla Nand Sinha & Ors

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

This appeal concerns whether notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.) is mandatory before suing the State. The High Court had held that such notice is required, but overlooked that the State had been allowed to join the case without raising any objection at the time. The Supreme Court held that while notice under Section 80 C.P.C. is generally necessary, it cannot be a bar when the State party has already been impleaded without protest. The appeal was disposed with directions allowing the appellant to file a fresh application before the High Court, which should consider the case on merits without dismissing it on grounds of delay alone."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Notice Requirements Pleadings and Procedures

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login