Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-10-03 partly_allowed

Satish Kumar vs State of Haryana

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this criminal appeal, Satish Kumar challenged his conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC (Indian Penal Code). The Supreme Court found that while the bodily injury inflicted was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature (meeting the third clause of Section 300 IPC), a Section 302 conviction was excessive. The Court converted the conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC, which covers causing death by rash or negligent act. The sentence was reduced to the seven years the appellant had already undergone in prison, resulting in his immediate release or remission of the remaining sentence."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Sentencing Homicide Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login