Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-10-07 partly_allowed

Satya Deo @ Bhoorey vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Satya Deo was convicted of murder under the Indian Penal Code, but claimed to be a juvenile at the time of the offence. The Supreme Court held that the reckoning date for determining juvenility is the date of the offence, not the date of first appearance in court. The Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 applies prospectively to pending cases only if the person was under eighteen years on 1 April 2001. The appeal was partly allowed and the matter remitted to the Juvenile Justice Board for determination of custody and compensation under the 2000 Act.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Juvenile Justice Sentencing Interpretation of Statutes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login