Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-10-07 partly_allowed

SATYA DEO @ BHOOREY vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Bench: 2 — S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

In this 2020 criminal appeal, the Supreme Court considered whether Satya Deo, convicted of murder in 1981 and sentenced to life imprisonment, was entitled to juvenile justice protection decades later. The Court held that a person is a "juvenile" if they were under 18 years of age on the date the offence was committed, not when they appear in court. Although Satya Deo's 1981 conviction predated the Juvenile Justice Act 2000, the Act applies to all pending proceedings and protects juveniles at any stage, even after conviction and appeal. The Court set aside the life sentence and remitted the case to the Juvenile Justice Board to determine appropriate orders, which may include fine and compensation but not imprisonment under the original sentence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Juvenile Justice Criminal Law Sentencing Statutory Interpretation Retrospective Application Appeal Age Determination

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login