Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-07-15 partly_allowed

Satyam Technocast vs Commissioner of C. Ex., Rajkot

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Satyam Technocast sought review of a Supreme Court judgment that had largely upheld a Central Excise demand against it but declined to remand the case because the tax effect was deemed minimal. The review petitioner demonstrated that the tax effect was actually substantial—approximately Rs. 27 lacs, plus interest and penalty. The Court partly allowed the review, setting aside its prior order and remanding the matter to the Commissioner for the limited purpose of excluding job work obtained from genuinely independent outside parties and recalculating the tax liability accordingly within six months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise Tax Law Job Work Classification of Entities Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login