Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-03-23 dismissed

Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar Mehra vs State of Jharkhand

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

A man convicted of criminal offences appealed his conviction and sentence, which included a fine. The High Court suspended his imprisonment but directed him to deposit the fine pending appeal. He argued that under Section 357(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the fine automatically stays during appeal. The Supreme Court held that Section 357(2) applies only to compensation directed to be paid from fine, not to fine as sentence itself. The Court clarified that the Appellate Court can suspend sentences and impose conditions under Section 389 without restriction. Since no compensation order was made, Section 357(2) did not apply, and the High Court's direction to deposit the fine was valid. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Sentence - Fine Appeal Suspension of Sentence Compensation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login