Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-12 allowed

SAU. KAMAL SHIVAJI POKARNEKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Bench: 3 — L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah, Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

A complainant alleged that respondents committed forgery and prepared false documents affecting a development agreement. The Trial Court issued process, but the High Court quashed it, holding the dispute was purely civil in nature. The Supreme Court held that at the stage of summoning, courts need only find a prima facie case and cannot evaluate merits. Since the complaint disclosed ingredients of criminal offences (forgery, false documentation), the proceedings could not be interdicted merely because the dispute had civil elements. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's judgment set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Cognizance Issuance of Process Complaint Procedure Forgery False Documents

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login