Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-12-18 dismissed

Saurav Yadav & Ors vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking mandamus to absorb/select police constables under unfilled vacancies, addressing the intersection of horizontal reservations (for women, dependents of Freedom Fighters, and Ex-Servicemen) with vertical social reservations. The Court held that horizontal reservations are overlapping, interlocking quotas to be calculated concurrently with vertical reservations, not separate rigid pools. Candidates entitled to horizontal reservation cannot be barred from open category selection based on merit alone; doing so would negate merit and create communal reservation. The Court rejected the state's contention that women from social categories must be confined to reserved seats, and found no case for mandamus absent proper statutory procedure."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Public Services Reservations Gender Equality Police Recruitment Mandamus Horizontal Reservations Vertical Reservations Merit

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login