Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-12-18 partly_allowed

SAURAV YADAV & ORS vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

Two female applicants, Ms. Sonam Tomar (OBC-Female) and Ms. Reeta Rani (SC-Female), sought relief after being rejected in the 2013 UP Police Constables recruitment despite scoring higher marks than some selected candidates. The core issue was whether reserved-category (OBC/SC) female candidates scoring above the General-Female cut-off could be selected for General-Female posts, or must be confined to their own category quotas. The Supreme Court held that horizontal reservations (for women) operate as "interlocking" mechanisms cutting across vertical (caste-based) reservations. Reserved-category women scoring above the General-Female cut-off are entitled to appointment in that open category based on merit. Confining them to their own categories while selecting less meritorious unreserved women would negate merit and constitute impermissible "communal reservation." The Court allowed the application for all 21 OBC female candidates who scored above 274.8928 marks, but dismissed claims of SC female candidates who scored below that threshold. The judgment rejected the Allahabad High Court's restrictive view and endorsed the principle that the open category is merit-based and available to all candidates regardless of caste.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Reservation Women Candidates Horizontal Reservation Public Service Selection Article 15(3) Article 16(4) Equality

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login