Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-07 allowed

Savita Devi & Ors vs Hawa Singh & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The deceased, a post office employee and LIC insurance agent earning L 3.5–5 lakh annually from insurance commissions, was killed in a motor accident. The Tribunal awarded L 12.64 lakh compensation, computing insurance income loss at only L 56,528 despite documentary proof of higher earnings. The High Court upheld this, reasoning legal heirs would receive commission on existing policies, so no loss occurred. The Supreme Court held such reasoning erroneous: a deceased agent's recurring income is genuine loss of earnings, not eliminated by post-death contractual payments to heirs. The Court enhanced compensation to L 25 lakh lump sum, emphasizing that proved income must be properly accounted for in compensation calculations.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Compensation Loss of Earnings Tortious Liability

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login