Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-03-03 disposed

Score Information Technologies Ltd vs Sriyash Technologies Ltd. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Score Information Technologies challenged the Division Bench's decision setting aside a Smart Card driving licence project arrangement made without public transparency. The appellant (Score) had entered an MOU with HILTRON (a public undertaking) to execute the work. The High Court's Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, finding no locus standi. The Division Bench reversed this, holding that the arrangement lacked transparency, violating Article 14 principles. The Supreme Court upheld the Division Bench but noted that bidder qualification must be assessed at award time, not locus standi stage. The Court directed the State to re-address the matter transparently within a decade-old MOU framework and expeditiously execute the project in public interest.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Procurement Transparency Public Sector Undertakings Locus Standi

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login