Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-03 disposed

Shafhi Mohammad vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed the use of videography in crime scene investigations to improve criminal justice administration. The Court held that a party without possession of a device producing electronic evidence need not produce a Section 65B(4) certificate if unjustly burdensome; such procedural requirements can be relaxed in justice's interest. The Court approved a phased implementation plan for crime scene videography as a best practice, emphasizing that electronic evidence is admissible if relevant, subject to stricter authenticity safeguards. A Central Oversight Body was established to implement the rollout by July 2018, with compliance monitored by Home Secretaries across States.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Law Electronic Evidence Crime Scene Investigation Police Administration Narcotic Drugs Technology in Investigations

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login