Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-03 remanded

Shafhi Mohammad vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This Supreme Court judgment addresses the use of videography in police investigations and clarifies the admissibility of electronic evidence. The Court held that a party not possessing the device that produced an electronic document cannot be required to produce a certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, and such procedural requirements can be relaxed in the interests of justice. The judgment approves a phased national implementation plan for crime scene videography, starting with capacity building and pilot projects, followed by gradual rollout across major cities and districts. The Court emphasized that videography strengthens criminal investigations and enhances justice delivery while maintaining authenticity safeguards. A Central Oversight Body was established to oversee implementation with funding support and compliance by July 2018."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Videography Crime Scene Investigation Electronic Evidence Drug Trafficking Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login