Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-06-28 partly_allowed

SHAIK AHMED vs STATE OF TELANGANA

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, R.Subhash Reddy

In Brief

A 13-year-old boy was kidnapped by an auto driver who took him to another location and called the boy's father demanding ransom of Rs. 2 lakhs. Police recovered the victim unhurt and arrested the accused. The trial court and High Court convicted the accused under Section 364A IPC (kidnapping for ransom). The Supreme Court held that while kidnapping for ransom was proved, the second essential ingredient of Section 364A—threatening death or hurt to the victim—was not established. The victim testified he was treated well and not assaulted. The Court set aside the Section 364A conviction but upheld conviction under Section 363 (simple kidnapping), sentencing the accused to seven years imprisonment instead of life."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Kidnapping and Abduction Ransom Demands Statutory Interpretation Appellate Criminal Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login