Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-21 allowed

Shailesh Manubhai Parmar vs Election Commission of India through the Chief Election Commissioner & Ors

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

The Supreme Court quashed circulars issued by the Election Commission of India introducing the NOTA (None of the Above) option in Rajya Sabha elections. The petitioner, a Congress Chief Whip, challenged the circulars as unconstitutional and contrary to Article 80(4) and the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The Court held that while the PUCL judgment authorized NOTA for direct elections based on universal adult suffrage, it cannot extend to indirect Rajya Sabha elections governed by proportional representation and party discipline. Allowing NOTA in Rajya Sabha would undermine vote value in the single transferable vote system, encourage defection by circumventing anti-defection provisions, and compromise electoral purity. The Election Commission exceeded its authority by extending a judicially-sanctioned right beyond its constitutional and statutory scope.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Election Law Constitutional Law Administrative Law Representation of the People Voting Rights Anti-Defection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login