In Brief
This case sought directions to combat honour crimes and honour killings in India, particularly in regions like Haryana, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh. The Supreme Court held that honour killing violates fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution. The Court declared that no assembly, including Khap Panchayats, can interfere with adult individuals' right to marry according to their choice. The Court issued comprehensive preventive, remedial, and punitive measures requiring States to identify at-risk areas, establish special cells for couple protection, and mandate fast-track trials. The Court emphasized that individual liberty and choice cannot be subjugated to notions of class or group honour.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.