Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-22 partly_allowed

Shayara Bano & Ors vs Union of India and others

Bench: 5 — Jagdish Singh Khehar, Joseph Kurian, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Uday Umrao Lalit, Pankhuri Shrivastava

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that while talaq-e-biddat (triple talaq) is an integral part of Muslim personal law and has constitutional protection under Article 25, it is arbitrary and gender-discriminatory. The Court issued a six-month injunction against pronouncing triple talaq while directing the Union of India to enact legislation to regulate or abolish the practice. Justice Kurian separately held that triple talaq violates the Quran and lacks legal sanctity. The Court recognized that reforms to personal law require legislative, not judicial, intervention. This balanced approach acknowledged women's rights while respecting constitutional protections of religious practices, leaving reform to Parliament and the Muslim community.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Personal Law Family Law Divorce Gender Equality Fundamental Rights Religion Muslim Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login