Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-22 partly_allowed

Shayara Bano & Ors vs Union of India and others

Bench: 5 — Jagdish Singh Khehar, A.M. Sapir, Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer, Kurian Joseph

In Brief

Shayara Bano, divorced by her husband through triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat), challenged its validity as unconstitutional and discriminatory. The Supreme Court held that while triple talaq is part of Muslim personal law protected by Article 25, to the extent the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 recognizes it, that Act is void under Article 13(1) as it violates fundamental rights of gender equality and human dignity. The practice is manifestly arbitrary and inconsistent with Quranic principles requiring reconciliation. The Court directed the Union to legislate on the issue and enjoined triple talaq pronouncements for six months pending legislation, reflecting the need for reform while respecting religious freedom within constitutional bounds.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Muslim Personal Law Family Law Gender Equality Constitutional Law Fundamental Rights Divorce Talaq-e-Biddat (Triple Talaq) Religious Practices Women's Rights Article 25 Analysis Article 13 Analysis

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login