Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-09 disposed

Shilpa Mittal vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Bench: 2 — Rajiv Khanna, Priya Varshnney

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered whether an offence under IPC Section 304 (causing death by negligence) with a maximum sentence exceeding 7 years but no mandatory minimum qualifies as 'heinous' under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015. The Court held such offences cannot be classified as heinous, as a 'heinous' offence requires a minimum 7-year sentence. However, recognising a statutory gap affecting child offenders committing serious crimes, the Court directed that offences with maximum sentences over 7 years be treated as 'serious' until Parliament clarifies the law. This protects children pending legislative reform."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Juvenile Justice Sentencing Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login