Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-09 allowed

Shivaji and Anr vs Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors

Bench: 3 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Parents of Shaji Shivaji Dudhade, who died in a car accident in 2010, claimed compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act. The MACT awarded Rs 4,60,800 with 9% interest. The High Court set aside this award, holding that Section 163A protects only innocent third parties, not a deceased driver who caused the accident. The Supreme Court reversed the High Court, holding that insurers cannot raise a negligence defence under Section 163A. The provision aims to provide expedited compensation through a structured formula, regardless of fault, overcoming delays in fault-based claims. The Tribunal's award was restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Insurance Law Tort Liability Compensation Accident Claims

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login