In Brief
A tenant in a saw mill on agricultural land filed a suit for permanent injunction against the property owner. The trial court granted the injunction based on evidence of lawful possession. The appellate court and high court reversed this, citing jurisdiction concerns and rules about agricultural land use. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the trial court had proper jurisdiction to grant the injunction protecting possession. However, the respondents retained rights to seek eviction and pursue revenue action to change the land use classification through appropriate authorities."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.