Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-04-23 partly_allowed

Shyam Prashad vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Shyam Prashad appealed against his conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, which the High Court had affirmed with a 15-year prison sentence. The Supreme Court limited its review to the quantum of sentence. Considering the facts, circumstances, and the appellant's plea for leniency, the Court reduced the sentence from 15 years to 10 years while upholding the conviction. The appeal was partly allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Appellate Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login