Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-22 partly_allowed

SHYAMLAL DEVDA AND OTHERS vs PARIMALA

Bench: 3 — R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

The respondent, a married woman residing temporarily in Bengaluru with her parents, filed a domestic violence petition against her husband, parents-in-law, and fourteen other relatives under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The appellants challenged the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Bengaluru. The Supreme Court held that the court had jurisdiction under Section 27(1)(a) of the Act because the respondent resided there. However, the Court quashed proceedings against appellants No.3 to 13 (distant relatives) as no specific allegations of domestic violence were made against them, permitting the case to proceed only against the husband and parents-in-law.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Domestic Violence Criminal Procedure Jurisdiction Family Law Protection of Women

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login