Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-14 disposed

SIDDARAJU vs STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS

Bench: 3 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, Aniruddha Bose, V. Ramasubramanian

In Brief

This batch of cases examined whether persons with disabilities can receive reservation in promotions under The Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The Court held that the Indra Sawhney prohibition against reservation in promotion applies only to backward classes under Article 16(4), not to disability-based reservation under Article 16(1). Once a post is identified as suitable for persons with disabilities under Section 32, it must be reserved regardless of recruitment mode. The 2005 Office Memorandum limiting disability reservation was declared illegal. The three judgments—Union of India v. National Federation of the Blind (2013), National Federation of the Blind v. Sanjay Kothari (2015), and Rajeev Kumar Gupta v. Union of India (2016)—must be strictly followed by the Union and State Governments.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Disability Rights Reservation in Employment Article 16 Promotion Equal Opportunities

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login