In Brief
In this custody dispute between estranged spouses Soumitra Kumar Nahar and Parul Nahar, the Supreme Court held that the welfare of the minor children Sanjana and Shravan is the paramount consideration, overriding parental preferences or technical objections. Despite marriage breakdown, both parents retain responsibility and children are entitled to both parents' love. The Court rejected the mother's attempt to unilaterally withdraw from a consensual 2013 settlement. It upheld the interim arrangement placing children in boarding school with shared vacation custody, and allowed both parties liberty to file independent custody petitions in competent courts, to be decided expeditiously without being influenced by these proceedings.", <parameter name="obiter">["The Court observed that it is unfortunate when grandparents are deprived of love and affection due to matrimonial disputes between children, and in this case both paternal grandparents died during pendency of proceedings—a message to litigating parties to introspect and seek amicable solutions rather than prolonging discord.", "The Court noted that while the Divorce Petition HMA No. 821 of 2011 is separate and distinct from custody matters, it should be decided expeditiously and independently without being influenced by observations in these proceedings.", "The Court observed that issues regarding school visits, consent for educational/recreational trips, and financial impact on children's upbringing may have substance but should be examined in future custody proceedings before the appropriate forum, not in these interim proceedings.", "The Court expressed concern that delay in custody determination causes severe and irrecompensable harm to children, depriving them of parental love and affection.", "The Court noted that although an ideal situation is when grandparents remain in company of children and grandchildren, few are fortunate to have this pleasure—a broader observation on family relationships and the destructive impact of matrimonial disputes."]
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.