Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-15 allowed

SRINIVASAN IYENGAR vs BIMLA DEVI AGARWAL

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah

In Brief

An insurance policyholder filed a criminal complaint against an insurance company and its agents, alleging cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy after she sent cheques totalling Rs. 92,000 based on false promises of bonus disbursement, but instead received insurance policies she never applied for. The accused moved to quash the proceedings. The Supreme Court allowed both appeals and quashed the criminal proceedings after the accused agreed to pay Rs. 10,00,000 in settlement. The Court held that despite the offences being technically non-compoundable, it could exercise power under Article 142 to permit settlement because the dispute was predominantly civil in nature, serving the ends of justice.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Insurance Law Compounding of Offences Constitutional Law Settlement and Compromise

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login