Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-01-06 allowed

State of A.P vs Patchimala Vigneswarudu @ Vigganna @ Ganapathi

Bench: 2 — Prafulla C. Pant

In Brief

The State challenged the High Court's acquittal of Patchimala Vigneswarudu of murder charges in the death of his wife Pachimala Ganga. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence: the accused had strained marital relations with the victim, took her to a late-night movie on 5 August 2001, was seen returning alone after midnight, and subsequently absconded. The victim's body was found the next morning with ligature marks around the neck indicating homicidal strangulation. The Supreme Court held that the complete chain of circumstances—motive, opportunity, medical evidence of homicidal death, and flight—irresistibly pointed to the accused's guilt. The High Court erred in applying irrelevant considerations. The conviction was restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Circumstantial Evidence Homicide Criminal Appeal High Court Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login