Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-10 disposed

State of Haryana and Ors. etc vs Bant Lal etc

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

In disputes over compensation for acquired land, the Supreme Court held that when land is acquired for public works but not fully utilised, the Government must return the unutilised portion to the owners. For the land actually used, compensation must be determined afresh by the High Court based on actual utilisation and evidence from both parties, rather than fixed per-acre rates. The Court offered the claimants a choice: accept fixed compensation (Rs.30 lakhs per acre for water works, Rs.40 lakhs for sewage treatment), or pursue remand for individual assessment of actual use. The Court emphasised that fixed valuations do not necessarily reflect principles of just compensation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Public Works Constitutional Law Judicial Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login