Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-01-19 allowed

State of Haryana vs Eros City Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Prafulla C. Pant

In Brief

The State of Haryana sought to acquire 129 kanals 14 marlas of land in Lakharpur village for the expansion and development of Surajkund Tourist Complex. The developer, Eros City Developers, opposed the acquisition arguing promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation based on earlier approvals for a hotel project. The High Court quashed the acquisition. The Supreme Court held that development of tourist infrastructure is a valid public purpose. The doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot override public interest when the government makes a genuine public purpose decision. The Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the State's appeal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Public Purpose Eminent Domain Promissory Estoppel Legitimate Expectation Administrative Law Land Use Regulation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login