Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-12-16 allowed

U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD THROUGH HOUSING COMMISSIONER & ANR vs NOOR MOHAMMAD & ORS

Bench: 2 — Hemant Gupta, V. Ramasubramanian

In Brief

The U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad sought to cancel a 2003 Notification releasing acquired land from acquisition, on the ground that the release was secured through false representations by the original owners claiming ancestral cemeteries. The owners claimed once land is released, fresh acquisition is required. The Supreme Court held that a Notification under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act is administrative, not quasi-judicial, and can be rescinded under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act. An order obtained through fraud confers no vested rights. Since the owners had violated the condition not to sell and instead engaged land mafia in commercial sales, the cancellation was valid. The Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the High Court's writ petitions, enabling the Parishad to proceed with the acquisition.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Administrative Law Property Rights Fraud and Misrepresentation General Clauses Act Quasi-Judicial Orders Natural Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login