Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-31 dismissed

State of Haryana vs Sunder Pal and Ors

Bench: 2 — Banumathi

In Brief

A nine-year-old boy was kidnapped in 1996, and his parents paid ransom for his release. The trial court convicted multiple accused persons for kidnapping under Section 364-A IPC. On appeal, the High Court acquitted seven of the accused but upheld the conviction of two (Vinod and Sohan). The State appealed the acquittals to the Supreme Court. The Court held that the High Court's acquittal was justified: only evidence showed that three accused directly took the victim on a motorcycle; the others were merely found playing cards nearby, with no evidence of their participation in the kidnapping or conspiracy. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the prosecution had not proven guilt beyond reasonable doubt against the acquitted persons.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Kidnapping Ransom Acquittal Appellate Procedure Burden of Proof Indian Penal Code

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login