Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-08 allowed

State of Himachal Pradesh and Others vs Satpal Saini

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

The State of Himachal Pradesh challenged a High Court direction requiring it to amend Section 118 of the H.P. Tenancy and Land Reforms Act within 90 days to allow non-agriculturist Himachalis to purchase land. The Supreme Court held that courts cannot direct the legislature to enact or amend laws, as this power is exclusively reserved to the legislature under the Constitution. While judicial review can examine the validity of existing laws, it cannot mandate legislative action or amendment. The Court emphasized separation of powers and that democratic accountability to voters, not judicial direction, properly governs legislative policy. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's direction was set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Separation of Powers Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction Administrative Law Tenancy and Land Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login