Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-11-24 allowed

State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr vs M/s. OASYS Cybernatics Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 3 — Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

In Brief

The State of Himachal Pradesh issued a Letter of Intent (LoI) to M/s OASYS Cybernetics for supplying ePoS devices for its Public Distribution System, subject to pre-conditions including compatibility testing, live demonstration, and formal agreement. After eight months of correspondence, the State cancelled the LoI without detailed reasons. The High Court quashed the cancellation. The Supreme Court held that an LoI is a provisional instrument—a 'promise in embryo'—not a binding contract until all conditions are met. Since the respondent failed to fulfil the stipulated pre-conditions and the State's cancellation was traceable to bona fide grounds (technical non-compliance), the Court upheld the cancellation and set aside the High Court's order, allowing the State to re-tender. The Court directed reimbursement of verified costs incurred by the respondent on quantum meruit principles.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Public Procurement Contract Law Constitutional Law Tender Law Arbitrariness Natural Justice Letter of Intent State Action

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login