Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-12-01 partly_allowed

State of Jharkhand and Ors vs Brahmputra Metallics Ltd., Ranchi and Anr

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

A manufacturing company operating a captive power plant in Jharkhand claimed a 50% electricity duty rebate for three fiscal years (2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) under the State's Industrial Policy 2012. The State issued the exemption notification on January 8, 2015, nearly three years late and with prospective effect only. The Supreme Court held the respondent entitled to the rebate for FY 2012-13 and 2013-14 (but not 2011-12), reasoning that the State's solemn representation in the Industrial Policy created a legitimate expectation protected by Article 14. The delay and prospective application were held arbitrary and in breach of the policy's commitment to issue follow-up notifications within one month. Technical defences (non-claim in returns, filing delay, unjust enrichment) were rejected. The entitlement was limited to the period following the date of production per the policy's express terms.</summary_100>

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Legitimate Expectation Promissory Estoppel State Action and Article 14 Arbitrariness Industrial Policy Tax Incentives Electricity Duty

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login