Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-12-01 partly_allowed

The State of Jharkhand and Ors vs Brahmputra Metallics Ltd., Ranchi and Anr

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra

In Brief

The State of Jharkhand promised in its 2012 Industrial Policy a 50% rebate on electricity duty for five years to industrial units with captive power plants. Although the State eventually issued the exemption notification on 8 January 2015, this occurred after a nearly three-year delay despite the policy's mandate to do so within one month. The respondent, a metallurgical unit, challenged the prospective effect of the notification, seeking retroactive exemption for FYs 2011-12, 2012-13, and 2013-14. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, holding that the State's delay and prospective notification breached legitimate expectations engendered by the policy and violated Article 14's guarantee of non-arbitrariness. The respondent was granted exemption for FYs 2012-13 and 2013-14 (not 2011-12, as entitlement arises only from the year following production), with the overpaid duty adjusted against future liability.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Duty Industrial Policy Administrative Law Promissory Estoppel Legitimate Expectation Article 14 Non-Arbitrariness Public Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login