Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-06 allowed

State of Karnataka & Ors vs Shankar Baburao Kangralkar & Anr

Bench: 2 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

The State of Karnataka appealed the High Court's decision requiring it to consider a candidate (Respondent No. 1) for the post of Hindi Language Assistant despite his lacking a B.Ed Degree with Hindi as a teaching method. The Supreme Court held that the recruitment rules establishing the Hindi Language Assistant position contain special eligibility requirements that are stricter than general language assistant requirements. The candidate must hold both a Bachelor's Degree with Hindi as a major subject AND a B.Ed Degree with Hindi as a specific teaching method. Since Respondent No. 1 lacked the B.Ed with Hindi as teaching method, he did not satisfy the eligibility criteria. The Court ruled that special statutory provisions override general ones, and therefore the recruitment authorities properly rejected his candidature. The appeal was allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Recruitment and Selection Educational Qualifications Statutory Interpretation Rules of Interpretation Public Employment Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login