Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-20 remanded

State of Maharashtra & Anr vs Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This case concerns Food Safety Officers' authority to lodge criminal complaints under the Indian Penal Code for violations of the Food and Safety Standards Act. The High Court had quashed criminal proceedings, holding that violations of a Food Safety Commissioner's prohibitory notification could be dealt with only under the FSS Act's penalty provisions, not the IPC. The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that Section 188 IPC applies to the Commissioner's orders and extends to acts endangering health and safety, not merely law and order breaches. The Court clarified that conduct violating both the FSS Act and IPC permits parallel prosecution under either or both enactments, though double punishment is prohibited. The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration on whether the specific IPC offences were established.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Food Safety Law Indian Penal Code Statutory Penalties Jurisdiction and Concurrent Prosecution Double Jeopardy

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login