In Brief
Multiple Special Leave Petitions raised constitutional questions about the scope of reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Articles 16(4), 16(4A), and 16(4B), particularly challenging the decision in M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006). The disputes involved whether the test of backwardness applies to SC/ST reservations and how the creamy layer doctrine applies within SC/ST communities. The Supreme Court held that rather than decide these issues itself, it would refer the matter to a Constitution Bench to examine whether M. Nagaraj requires reconsideration, placing the case before the Chief Justice of India for constitution of the appropriate bench.</summary_100> </invoke>
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.