Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-11-26 remanded

State of Tamil Nadu & Anr vs M. Mangayarkarasi and etc

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Two employees of the Tamil Nadu District Treasury were dismissed for admitting and sanctioning over 90 and 105 bogus bills respectively, involving misappropriation of approximately Rs 45-52 lakhs each. The High Court had reduced their punishment to stoppage of increments, citing parity with other employees given lighter sentences. The Supreme Court held that parity cannot apply when the gravity of misconduct and quantum of loss differ materially. The Court set aside the High Court judgment and remanded the case for fresh consideration, emphasizing that disciplinary authorities have discretion in determining punishment proportionate to the severity of established charges."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Disciplinary Proceedings Service Law Judicial Review Proportionality of Punishment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login