In Brief
The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged a High Court order in a contempt proceeding. The High Court had initially directed the state to decide a pending representation for payment within four weeks. The state did decide the representation, concluding the disputed works were still under inquiry. The respondents filed a contempt petition, and the High Court issued an order to adjudicate their entitlement. The Supreme Court held that the initial High Court direction was complied with once the representation was considered and orders passed. A contempt petition cannot be used to determine entitlement for payment; respondents must pursue other legal remedies against the authority's decision. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's contempt order was set aside."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.