Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-09 allowed

Sube Singh and Anr vs Shyam Singh (Dead) and Ors

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

A 23-year-old unmarried man died in a motor accident in 2009. His parents claimed compensation for loss of dependency. The Motor Accident Tribunal applied multiplier 15 based on the parents' age, but the High Court reduced it to 14, citing an earlier Supreme Court decision. The Supreme Court held that multipliers in motor accident cases must be applied based on the deceased's age, not the dependants' age, to ensure certainty and avoid disputes. The Court increased the multiplier from 14 to 18 (appropriate for a 23-year-old), proportionally increasing compensation from Rs. 5.29 lakh to Rs. 6.80 lakh, and raised the interest rate to 9% per annum.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Accident Claims Compensation Calculation Loss of Dependency Multiplier Method Tort Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login