Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-20 partly_allowed

Sudarsan Puhan vs Jayanta Ku. Mohanty & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A motorcyclist severely injured in a 2012 accident and suffering paraplegia claimed compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 24,62,065/-. The High Court, acting as first appellate court, reduced this to Rs. 20,00,000/- without providing reasoned findings on evidence or legal principles. The Supreme Court held that the High Court failed its first appellate duty to address all issues, contentions, and evidence with reasons. The Court set aside the High Court's order and remanded the claimant's enhancement appeal for fresh hearing, emphasizing that appellate courts must provide reasoned findings on all substantial questions raised by parties."}

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Compensation Appellate Procedure Accident Claims Tribunal Insurance Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login