Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-17 allowed

Sudhir Ranjan Patra (Dead) thr. LRs. & Anr vs Himansu Sekhar Srichandan & Ors

Bench: 2 — M. R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

A property rights suit was decreed ex parte against defendants who later sought to set aside the decree and file a written statement. The trial court allowed the application and set aside the decree but did not decide whether defendants could file a written statement. The High Court set aside the decree but imposed a blanket bar on filing a written statement. The Supreme Court held that since the prayer to file a written statement was expressly made but never decided by the trial court, the High Court cannot impose a bar. The trial court must now decide the question of permitting the written statement on its own merits.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Code of Civil Procedure Order IX Rule 13 Ex Parte Decrees Written Statements Appellate Jurisdiction Trial Court Powers

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login