In Brief
The appellant was convicted of murdering his real brother under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code based on eyewitness evidence regarding the nature of injuries inflicted. He appealed, claiming unsound mind as a defence, but produced no supporting medical evidence. The High Court and Supreme Court both upheld the conviction, finding the evidence reliable. However, recognising that 20 years of actual imprisonment had been served in a case of fraternal conflict, the Supreme Court disposed of the appeal by directing the State to consider premature release and ordering immediate release on self bond pending the government's final decision.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.