In Brief
A property owner brought suit for permanent injunction against defendants who allegedly interfered with her possession of a plot she purchased in 2002. Both the trial court and appellate court dismissed the suit, finding she had failed to prove lawful possession. The Supreme Court dismissed the second appeal at admission stage, holding that it raised no substantial questions of law—only factual matters regarding possession that the lower courts had properly decided. Under Section 100 CPC, second appeals are restricted to cases involving substantial legal questions; factual disputes cannot be revisited.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.