Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-21 allowed

Suman Devi vs Manisha Devi and Ors

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

The appellant and respondent contested a panchayat ward councilor election in Haryana. The respondent filed an election petition within 30 days, but withdrew it when faced with a procedural objection. She then filed a second petition after the 30-day statutory deadline expired. The appellant challenged the second petition as time-barred. The Court held that the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act is a complete code for election petitions, with an absolute 30-day filing deadline that cannot be extended under the Limitation Act. The respondent's withdrawal strategy did not restart the limitation period. The second petition was dismissed as barred by limitation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electoral Law Panchayati Raj Limitation Civil Procedure Election Petition

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login