Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-31 disposed

Surendra Wamanrao Deshmukh vs State of Maharashtra and Anr

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Surendra Wamanrao Deshmukh, compulsorily retired from service, claimed entitlement to compassionate pension under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Rule 100. The High Court had declined to consider his case despite similarly situated persons receiving such relief. The Supreme Court found merit in his grievance and disposed of the appeal by permitting him to file a fresh representation before the State, directing that it be decided on merits within three months with a hearing opportunity if requested, making clear that the High Court's judgment would not hinder the State's consideration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Pension Social Security Compulsory Retirement Compassionate Relief Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login