Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-04 disposed

Susme Builders Pvt. Ltd vs Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta

In Brief

This landmark case concerns a 23,018-square-metre slum in Mumbai where over 800 residents formed a cooperative society and own the land. After appointing Susme Builders as developer in 1985, the scheme languished for over 30 years with minimal progress. When DCR regulations were amended in 1997 requiring 70% resident agreements, disputes arose. In 2009, the Society switched to J.G. Developers, which promised larger flats. The Court held neither developer qualified: Susme caused inexplicable delay and lacked 70% agreements; J.G. used misrepresentation. The Supreme Court directed a fresh transparent tender inviting reputed developers, requiring 2-year rehabilitation completion, Rs. 200 crore guarantee, and adequate compensation to slum dwellers as land owners.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Slum Rehabilitation Real Estate Development Administrative Law Consumer Protection Land Law Housing Cooperative Societies Delay and Laches Tender Process Public Interest Litigation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login